Open Letter from Women of Faith on Assisted Dying

Photo: Theos

Source – Theos

Religious think-tank, Theos, has published an open letter signed by over 100 women from different faith traditions voicing significant concerns over the current proposed legislation for Assisted Dying.

We believe that the Terminally Ill Adults Bill has insufficient safeguards to protect some of the most vulnerable in society, particularly women subject to gender-based violence.

Colette Joyce, Justice and Peace Co-ordinator for the Diocese of Westminster, and Nikki Dhillon-Keane, Head of Safe in Faith for Caritas Westminster, are among the signatories.

Our open letter was reported on in The Guardian and the Church Times.

The full text is below:

Open letter from women of faith on assisted dying

4 April 2025

We write as a group of women of faith from different traditions and backgrounds passionate about care for people in vulnerable situations, many of whom have dedicated our professional lives to preventing male violence against women and girls.  

We hold a variety of views on the principle of legalising assisted dying. However, we are all clear that the current legislation – The Terminally Ill Adults Bill – progressing through parliament, has insufficient safeguards to protect some of the most marginalised in society, particularly women subjected to gender–based violence, and abuse by a partner, who also experience intersecting barriers to a full and safe life. 

We are concerned that the proposed legislation could create a new tool to harm vulnerable women, particularly those being subjected to domestic abuse and coercive control, by helping them to end their lives. 

report out last month showed that the number of domestic abuse victims who died by suicide in England and Wales was higher than the number of people killed by their abusive partner, for the second year running. 

We know too that domestic abuse victims who are also women of faith can face a particular form of abuse[1] at the hands of their perpetrators, who may weaponise theologies and culture to harm and control their victims. We are concerned that the assisted dying legislation, as it stands, fails to take account of how faith and its role at the end of life, as well as its use by both perpetrators and the women they abuse, create complex dynamics that can lead to vulnerable women, who may also hold strong religious beliefs, seeing no way out but death.

We know that poverty and other inequalities increase the risk of women and girls being subjected to violence, ill health and the quality of care and support they receive from statutory institutions and civil society. We know too that in a society riven with inequalities, women who are from Black and minoritised communities, disabled women, migrant women and working–class women, struggle to be heard. Their voices are absent from conversations about this bill, and so too are those subjective to coercive control or violence. It is unclear to us how the legislation and its consultative process has taken account of the multiplicity of faiths, cultures, socio–economic and health backgrounds of our citizens and women who make up our country. 

Much of the debate inside and outside parliament has been conducted by those empowered to speak of the importance of personal choice, without consideration of those who struggle to be heard in the public square. It is the voices of the unheard, ignored, and marginalised that we are compelled by our faith traditions and scriptures to listen and draw attention to, in the pursuit of good law–making for the common good – legislation that considers and protects the most vulnerable, not just those who speak loudest.

Having followed the progress of the bill through parliament, we are particularly concerned about: 

  • The risk that people (mainly women) with controlling and abusive partners (mainly men) will be coerced into assisted death. While we welcome the adopted amendments that stipulate training for the assessing doctors and the panel members, this safeguard only comes into play after someone has already been coerced into declaring that they want an assisted death, and will clearly not catch all cases. We also know, from research and experience, that coercive control is a long–term process that is both insidious and subtle with women often unaware of it until the perpetrator’s behaviour escalates. 
  • The reality that since 2016, deaths by suicide have been included in the scope of domestic homicide reviews and there is growing research on women who die by suicide as directly linked to having an abusive partner. We are concerned that if this legislation passes, women may seek assisted deaths to end their suffering at the hands of an abuser. Domestic Homicide Reviews also reveal the disproportionate number of Black and minoritised women who are failed by statutory and state agencies like the police, social services, health services and specialist services like substance misuse and mental health and women’s services despite their calls for help.    
  • There are no longer High Court protections embedded in the Bill
  • There are insufficient protections for those with learning disabilities and people with anorexia. 
  • The use of the vehicle of the Private Member’s Bill for this landmark legislation. This has resulted in the impact assessment being shared after the Bill Committee stage, which makes it difficult for all of us with concerns about inequalities to gauge how this legislation will affect Black and minoritised and faith communities, people with disabilities, and those experiencing economic disadvantage.

If assisted dying is seen as a response to alleviate suffering, without addressing the underlying structural issues that make life difficult and safeguard against harm, it could put undue pressure on vulnerable women to choose death over inadequate care.

This is no way to legislate, especially not on matters of life and death. We have serious concerns about the bill and its lack of safeguards. The bill has too much potential to hurt vulnerable people and so we are uniting as women from across faith traditions to speak up for vulnerable women, including victims of violence against women and girls, and disabled women, and raise our concerns publicly.

Signatories:

  1. Chine McDonald, director, Theos
  2. Bekah Legg, CEO, Restored
  3. Huda Jawad, co–founder and executive director, Faith and VAWG Coalition
  4. Sam Clifford, CEO, Jewish Women’s Aid
  5. The Rt Revd and Rt Hon Dame Sarah Mullally DBE, Bishop of London
  6. Dr Naomi Green, Assistant Secretary General, Muslim Council of Britain
  7. Professor Sheila The Baroness Hollins, President, The Catholic Union of Great Britain
  8. Rabbi Debbie Young–Somers
  9. Zara Mohammed, former secretary general, Muslim Council of Britain
  10. Hannah Rich, director, Christians on the Left
  11. Revd Dr Helen Paynter, founding director, Centre for the Study of Bible and Violence
  12. Naomi Lerer, CEO, Noa Girls 
  13. Amanda Jackson, senior advisor on diversity, World Evangelical Alliance
  14. The Rt Revd Rachel Treweek, Lord Bishop of Gloucester and Anglican Bishop for HM Prisons
  15. Commissioner Jenine Main, Territorial Leader, The Salvation Army, United Kingdom and Ireland
  16. Louisa Collyer–Hamlin, Head of External Affairs, Catholic Union
  17. Patricia Stoat, Science Health & Bioethics Committee of the National Board of Catholic Women
  18. Rt Revd Rose Hudson–Wilkin, Bishop of Dover
  19. Dr Sahira Dar, president, British Islamic Medical Association
  20. Rachel Fink, CEO, S&P Sephardi Jewish Community
  21. Tola Doll Fisher, Creative Director and Editor, Premier Woman Alive
  22. Elizabeth Harris Sawczenko, OBE, Interfaith consultant 
  23. Nikki Dhillon Keane, Head of Caritas Safe in Faith
  24. Jagbir Jhutti–Johal, Professor of Sikh Studies, University of Birmingham 
  25. Professor Tina Beattie, Professor Emerita of Catholic Studies, University of Roehampton, London
  26. The Rt Revd Dr Joanne Woolway Grenfell, Bishop of Stepney and Lead Safeguarding Bishop for the Church of England
  27. Natalie Collins, author and activist
  28. Sian Rees, head of Bible Society Wales
  29. Rt Revd Dr Jill Duff, Anglican Bishop of Lancaster
  30. The Rt Revd Vivienne Faull, Lord Bishop of Bristol
  31. Rev Catherine De Souza, CEO, Prison Fellowship England & Wales
  32. ​​Sally Hope, Domestic Abuse Practitioner and Writer
  33. Dr Selina Stone, Lecturer in Theology and Ethics, University of Edinburgh
  34. Dawn McAvoy, Both Lives UK
  35. Mandy Marshall, Director for Gender Justice, Anglican Alliance and Anglican Communion
  36. Revd Jenni Entrican, Former President of the European Baptist Federation
  37. Alicia Edmund, Head of public policy Evangelical Alliance
  38. Dr Madeleine Pennington, Quaker writer and head of research, Theos 
  39. Damilola Makinde, Advocacy engagement lead, Evangelical Alliance
  40. Julia Bicknell, ex–BBC Woman’s Hour producer; lay chaplain for asylum seekers/refugees
  41. The Rt Revd Dr Rosemarie Mallett, Bishop of Croydon
  42. Rev Mae Christie, Vicar, All Saints, Tooting
  43. Joy Madeiros, Co–Founder, Oasis UK
  44. Ann–Louise Graham, journalist and biblical counselor
  45. Prof. Anna Rowlands, St Hilda Professor of Catholic Social Thought and Practice
  46. Canon Dr Sanjee Perera, lay canon of Liverpool Cathedral, organisational psychologist and theologian
  47. Aja Thorburn, writer 
  48. Michelle Tant, Midwifery Lecturer and writer
  49. Joanna Davey, editorial director, Hodder Faith 
  50. Rev Bryony Taylor, Rector of Barlborough and Clowne and Author
  51. Dr Elizabeth Dalgarno, director, SHERA research group
  52. Dr Caroline Hull, national director, Aid to the Church in Need (UK)
  53. Amy Summerfield, CEO, Kyria Network 
  54. Rev Liz Clutterbuck, Priest–in–Charge Emmanuel Hornsey Road, Islington
  55. Rev Leonora Wassell, Co–Chair, Methodist Women in Britain
  56. Rebecca (Bex) Chapman, General Synod member and vice–chair, Christians in Media
  57. Debra Green OBE, CEO, ROC
  58. Alice Gray, palliative care doctor and assistant pastor, Oasis Church, Birmingham
  59. Ruth Parrott, former president and co–chair, Methodist Women in Britain
  60. Shermara Fletcher–Hoyte, Principal Officer for Pentecostal, Charismatic and Multi–cultural Relations, Churches Together in England
  61. Catherine Butcher, author, lay reader, and member of General Synod
  62. Faith Van Horne, PhD, Theology and Religion, University of Birmingham 
  63. Jamie Phear, writer and speaker 
  64. Rachel Muers, Professor of Divinity, University of Edinburgh 
  65. Jayne Manfredi, Anglican Deacon
  66. Katharine Lock
  67. Rev Cham Kaur–Mann, Co–Director, Next Leadership
  68. The Rt Revd Esther Prior, Bishop of Aston
  69. Rev Dr Kate Coleman, Co–Director, Next Leadership
  70. Rosemary Nuamah–Williams, policy Adviser and advocate
  71. Jo Chamberlain, National Environment Officer, Church of England Environment Programme
  72. Dr Usha Reifsnider, Co regional Director, Lausanne Europe, Cultural Theology Consultant
  73. ​​Lucy Butt, CEO, Bramber Bakehouse
  74. Dr Janet Soskice, Professor of Philosophical Theology, Emeritus, University of Cambridge
  75. Stella Mbubaegbu CBE, FE College Principal & Chief Executive
  76. Mary McHugh, National Board of Catholic Women of England and Wales
  77. Hope Virgo, author, campaigner and Secretariat for the APPG for Eating Disorders
  78. Rev Bev Thomas Ecumenical Minister & Social Justice Advocate
  79. Rev Claire McClelland, Head of Chaplaincy, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals 
  80. Rev Jenny Kimble, Dean of Undergraduate Studies, Regents Theological College
  81. Rev. Michelle Nunn, Principal, Regents Theological College, and Member of Elim’s National Leadership Team
  82. The Venerable Karen Best, Archdeacon of Manchester  
  83. Dr Anne Richards, Policy Adviser, Church of England
  84. Revd Dr Hannah Lewis, Lead Chaplain among the Deaf Community, Diocese of Oxford
  85. Janie Oliver, CEO, Stewardship
  86. Dr Calida Chu, Associate Editor, Practical Theology
  87. The Revd Jessica Monopoli, Assistant Curate, St Mary’s Cockerton, and Clergy Lead at The Haven in Darlington, Co. Durham
  88. Bobbi Kumari, founder, Living in Light 
  89. Barbara Earl, Croydon Quakers
  90. Danielle Finch, freelance writer (disability, family & faith)
  91. Rev. Rebecca Amoroso, Hospital Chaplain
  92. Christina Mottram, retired lay Catholic hospital chaplain, Leicester Hospitals
  93. Salomé Criddle, CEO, Thriving Women In Real Life
  94. Revd Dr Joanne Cox– Darling, Methodist presbyter
  95. Anupama Ranawana, Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Theology and Religion, University of Durham
  96. Danielle Wilson, Pioneer Pastor, Birmingham
  97. Dr Claire Williams OMS, Lecturer in Practical Theology, Academic Inclusion Advocate, Regents Theological College
  98. Reverend Joyce Fletcher, National Executive Director of Women and Family for the Church of God of Prophecy
  99. Dionne Gravesande, trustee of Restored and co–chair, National Church Leader Forum
  100. Dr Beverley Samways, Director, Unique Connections
  101. Alianore Smith, member of the General Synod of the Church of England
  102. Revd Novette Headley,  Chair – Birmingham Methodist District
  103. Colette Joyce, co–ordinator, Justice and Peace Commission, Diocese of Westminster
  104. The Revd. Lis Goddard, vicar, St James the Less Pimlico
  105. Doreen Patricia Waugh, domestic abuse practitioner, Justice and peace representative
  106. Rev. Sarah Whittleston, National Elim Prayer Director
  107. Dr Eve Poole OBE Lay Canon, York Minster 
  108. Revd Alexandra Lilley, Vicar, St George and All Saints Tufnell Park and Dean of Women’s Ministry
  109. Michelle Dumont
  110. Revd. Canon Kate Wharton, Vicar of St. Bartholomew’s Church, Roby, Liverpool, General Synod member, and Prolocutor of the Lower House of the Convocation of York.
  111. Rani Joshi – South Asian Forum coordinator / Evangelical Alliance
  112. Baroness Shaista Gohir – CEO, Muslim Women’s Network UK 

This initiative follows a meeting organised in partnership with the Faith and Violence Against Women and Girls Coalition, and Restored, facilitated by Jewish Women’s Aid, and brought together by Theos.

For more information, see:

Addressing Spiritual Abuse in Ending Violence Against Women – Faith & VAWG Coalition

The Meaning of Dignity: What’s beneath the assisted dying debate? – Theos 

Cardinal Nichols Criticises ‘Deeply Irresponsible’ Assisted Suicide Bill

Source: RCDOW Photo: © Mazur/cbcew.org.uk

Cardinal Nichols has called the way in which the assisted suicide bill is being handled ‘deeply irresponsible’ and a ‘shambles’.

Speaking to Christian Fellowship, a group at News UK, the Cardinal expressed serious concern that MPs had only spent a few hours debating assisted suicide when they spent more than a hundred times longer debating banning fox hunting in 2004.

He said:

‘I believe it is deeply irresponsible of any government to allow a change of this magnitude to be carried out without due, proper, government-supported parliamentary process’.

‘I think what’s happening, if it came to pass, would be the biggest change that this country has seen for many, many decades at least, probably more. On the back of what – five, six, seven hours’ debate?

‘I was told that the fox hunting bill [in 2004] endured 700 hours of debate.’

Despite these concerns, he hoped that the bill could still be defeated as it makes it way through the Houses of Parliament: ‘I don’t think that story’s over yet.’

The Hunting Act 2004 passed after 700 hours of parliamentary debate and a government inquiry – the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) bill, passed on November 29 by 330 to 275 last year after five hours of debate.

Cardinal Nichols added that there was ‘something deeply lacking in a government that isn’t prepared to guide and sponsor,if it wants to, this process of legal change’.

In October last year, Cardinal Nichols issued a pastoral letter to his diocese, encouraging Catholics to contact their MPs ahead of the debate.

In it, he raised concerns: ‘the right to die can become a duty to die’.

He said:

‘Once assisted suicide is approved by the law, a key protection of human life falls away. Pressure mounts on those who are nearing death, from others or even from themselves, to end their life in order to take away a perceived burden of care from their family, for the avoidance of pain, or for the sake of an inheritance.’

‘The radical change in the law now being proposed risks bringing about for all medical professionals a slow change from a duty to care to a duty to kill.’

Cardinal Signs Multi-Faith Letter Opposing Assisted Suicide

Cardinal Vincent Nichols. Photo: CBCEW

Source: CBCEW

Cardinal Vincent Nichols, Archbishop of Westminster, has co-signed a multi-faith letter ahead of the assisted suicide vote in parliament on Friday:

As leaders of faith communities we wish to express our concern at the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) bill, which will be debated by MPs on 29th November. We are aware of how complex and weighty this topic is. There are many dimensions to the bill, all of them of great ethical and practical importance. We hold in prayer all those across our country who may be personally affected, and our representatives in Parliament with profound decisions before them.

Part of the role of faith leaders in communities is to provide spiritual and pastoral care for the sick and for the dying. We hold the hands of loved ones in their final days, we pray with families both before and after death. It is to this vocation that we have been called, and it is from this vocation that we write.

Our pastoral roles make us deeply concerned about the impact the bill would have on the most vulnerable, opening up the possibility of life-threating abuse and coercion. This is a concern we know is shared by many people, with and without faith.

In the UK, it is estimated that 2.7 million older people have been subjected to abuse; many of these may also be vulnerable to pressure to end their lives prematurely. Disability campaigners and those working with women in abusive relationships have also highlighted the danger of unintended consequences should the law be changed. The experience of jurisdictions which have introduced similar legislation, such as Oregon and Canada, demonstrate how tragic these unintended consequences can be. Promised safeguards have not always protected the vulnerable and marginalised.

Even when surrounded by loving family and friends, people towards the end of their life can still feel like a burden. This is especially the case while adult social care remains underfunded. In this environment, it is easy to see how a ‘right to die’ could all too easily end in feeling you have a duty to die.

We are convinced that the current law provides much greater security for those who are vulnerable than the bill before Parliament. A bill which MPs will have had only three weeks to scrutinise before they vote on it. The most effective safeguard against life-threatening coercion or abuse is to keep the law as it is.

In supporting the state of the current law, we do not deny that some people experience a painful death, though we welcome the fact that these deaths are far less common than they used to be due to advances in palliative care.

Over decades we have witnessed how compassionate care, along with the natural processes of dying, allow those at the end of their life to experience important moments. We have seen relationships repair and families reconcile. We have seen lives end in love. Much can be lost by cutting these processes short.

We believe that a truly compassionate response to the end of life lies in the provision of high-quality palliative care services to all who need them. While there are many examples of excellent palliative care in this country, it remains worryingly underfunded. Investment in palliative care is the policy of a truly compassionate nation. It is the way to ensure that everyone in society, including the most vulnerable, receive the care they deserve at the end of life.

Sarah Mullally, Bishop of London and former Chief Nursing Officer;
Cardinal Vincent Nichols Archbishop of Westminster;
Ephraim Mirvis, Chief Rabbi of the United Hebrew Congregations of the Commonwealth.
Sayed Abdul Saheb Al-Khoei, Secretary General of Al-Khoei Foundation;
Archbishop Angaelos, Coptic Orthodox Church;
Imam Qari Asim, Chair of MINAB (Mosques and Imams Advisory Board);
Glyn Barrett, National Leader Assemblies of God;
Anil Bhanot, Managing Trustee of the Hindu Council UK;
Gavin Calver, CEO of Evangelical Alliance;
Malcolm Deboo, President, Zoroastrian Trust Funds of Europe;
Joseph Dweck, Senior Rabbi of the Spanish & Portuguese Sephardi Community;
Pinchas Hackenbroch, Chair of the Rabbinical Council;
Ross Hendry, CEO of CARE (Christian Action, Research and Education);
Trevor Howard, Executive Vice-Chair of the Board, Churches in Communities International;
Andrew John, Archbishop of Church in Wales;
Nikitas Lulias, Archbishop of Great Britain, Greek Orthodox Church;
Paul Main and Jenine Main, Territorial Leaders of The Salvation Army in the United Kingdom and Ireland;
Patrick McKinney, Bishop of Nottingham, Roman Catholic Church;
Zara Mohammed, Secretary General of the Muslim Council of Britain;
Bhai Sahib Mohinder Singh Ahluwalia, Spiritual Leader & Chair, Guru Nanak Nishkam Sewak Jatha; Trupti Patel, President of the Hindu Forum of Britain;
Mark Pugh, General Superintendent of Elim Pentecostal Churches;
Mehool Sanghrajka, Chair of the Institute of Jainology;
Venerable Bogoda Seelawimala, President of Sri Lankan Sangha Sabha of GB;
Lord Singh of Wimbledon, Director of the Network of Sikh Organisations UK;
Jonathan Wittenberg, Senior Rabbi of Masorti Judaism;
Mar Awraham Youkhanis, Bishop of London, Assyrian Church of the East.